By: Ray Smith. We have all heard racial
integration defended and advocated on the grounds that we have deprived our
country of the benefit of the talents and abilities of the Negroes - that the
Negroes have a positive contribution to make and we have failed to take
advantage of it. Because of our irrational prejudice against the Negroes, we
have excluded them from full participation in American society and, we are
told, this is America's loss.
The Lesson of History
In view of the fact that we are now being
forced to integrate with the Negroes and grant them equal participation, it
might be instructive to look at other countries which have integrated with
Negroes in the past to see what the Negroes gave them. What is the historical
evidence?
There is a wealth of material here for
study in such places as Haiti, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Brazil, etc., but the nearest
parallel to the United States today is Portugal in the 16th century.
It may come as a surprise to hear of the
Negroes' role in the history of Portugal, for in spite of all the emphasis on
"Black studies" in our schools, no one seems to talk about the
Blacks' contribution to Portugal - neither the Portuguese, the Blacks, nor our
modern historians who are rewriting our history books to make the Negroes look
good. It takes considerable digging in books written before our modern era of
forced integration to uncover the story of Portugal.
Poets and Explorers
By the middle of the 16th century, Portugal
had risen to a position analogous to that of the United States today. Portugal
was the wealthiest, most powerful country in the world, with a large empire and
colonies in Asia, Africa and America. The Portuguese people were, like the
Elizabethans in England, poets and explorers, a race of highly civilized,
imaginative, intelligent, and daring people. They showed great potential and
had already made important contributions to the Renaissance. But, unlike
England and other European countries, Portugal had a large and rapidly growing
Negro population and, at the same time, its white population was declining.
Portugal began the Negro slave trade after
encountering Negroes in its explorations and forays into Africa. Portugal
brought the first Black slaves to Lisbon in 1441, and they continued to be
imported in such numbers that by 1550, the population of Portugal was 10
percent Negro (the U.S. is 13-14 percent Negro today).
Defilement of the Blood
There was no taboo or injunction against
sexual relations with the Negroes, and the Negroes blood soon became
assimilated into the general population through miscegenation, so that today
there are no Negroes, as such, in Portugal. The present-day population of
Portugal is described by the New York Times Encyclopedic Almanac, 1971, as follows:
"Ethnic Composition: The people are a mixture of various ethnic strains,
including Celtic, Arab, Berber, Phoenician, Carthaginian, Lusitanian, and other
racial influences. The present population is one of the most homogeneous in
Europe, with no national minorities." (Note that the Negro strain is not
listed by the New York Times).
What you can see in Portugal today is the
product of uniform, non-selective mixing of the 10 percent Negroes and 90
percent Whites into one homogeneous whole. In effect, it is a new race - a race
that has stagnated in apathy and produced virtually nothing in the last 400
years.
The Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed.,
1911, in its article on Portugal states,
"The Portuguese intermarried
freely with their slaves, and this infusion of alien blood profoundly modified
the character and physique of the nation. It may be said without exaggeration
that the Portuguese of the 'age of discoveries' and the Portuguese of the 17th
and later centuries were two different races."
People Without a Future
The contribution of this new race to
civilization in terms of literature, art, music, philosophy, science, etc. has
been practically nothing. Portugal today is the most backwards country in
Europe. The illiteracy rate is 38 percent (in the U.S., 2.2 percent, Japan, 1.0
percent). The infant mortality rate in Portugal is 59.2 per 1000 births (in
Sweden, 12.9 percent, U.S., 20.7 percent, France, 20.4 percent). The workers
wages are the lowest in Western Europe, the equivalent of a little more than $2.00
a day.
Portugal is a forgotten land - bypassed by
the tourists and shunned by the scholars. It is a sad country, known mainly for
its plaintive, mournful fado music - nostalgic music that looks to the past and
sees no future.
Portugal and America
In spite of the close similarity between
the situation of Portugal in the 1550's and the United States today, we cannot
predict that the outcome of our racial integration with Negroes will be exactly
the same. The historical significance, however, is that any country, society,
or group which has integrated to any appreciable extent with the Negroes has
suffered drastically in its ability to maintain a civilized standard of living
and its ability to compete with others. There is no evidence that any other country
ever gained anything from integration with Negroes.
It should be pointed out that the
Negro-White ratio, 1:9, in Portugal in the 1550's does not represent the final
percentage of Negro genes, for the Negro element was rapidly increasing while
the White element was declining. The male Whites were leaving Portugal in large
numbers - sailing, settling in the colonies, and marrying native women (the
government encouraged this). Most of the Negro slaves brought to Portugal were
adult males. The population was thus unbalanced - an excess of White women and
Negro males, and a shortage of White men. Chronicles of the era relate that
Portuguese women kept Negro slaves as "pets". They also married them.
The situation in the U.S. today is not too
different. The radical-chic Whites have their Black pets.
Our percentage of the Negro element today
does not represent the final amalgam. The Negro birth rate is almost twice as
high as that of the Whites.
There is no White population explosion in America,
or anywhere in the world. It is all colored. The colored woman has the
children; the White women are on the pill or have abortions.
What the final amalgam in America will be
we can not say, but if the present trends continue, the Negro element will be
much more than 14 percent.
Why Did Portugal Integrate?
The British, French, Dutch, Spanish, and
Portuguese all engaged in the Negro slave trade, but only Portugal brought them
to their own country. The question arises - why did Portugal so willingly
accept racial integration with Negroes while other European countries kept the
Negroes out and maintained their racial integrity? What was the climate of
opinion, the current ideology, teaching, or propaganda that led the Portuguese
to depart from the behavior of the other countries? What was the difference
about Portugal?
You will not find the answer to these
questions in our modern history books and recently published encyclopedias, for
the whole subject of the decline has become taboo. You will have to dig into
older sources and discover your own answers.
You might also ask yourself why America is
accepting racial integration while most of the rest of the world is
"racist." Why are we different?
The Role of the Jew
One significant difference in Portugal
before its fall in the 16th century was that it had become a haven for Jews.
For several centuries, the Jews had more wealth, influence, and more power in
Portugal than in any other European country. In 1497, at Spain's request, the
Jews were asked to leave Portugal or be converted. Most of them became normal
Christians and remained.
However, by 1550 many of the Jews were
voluntarily leaving. They saw the writing on the wall. The Encyclopedia
Britannica (edition of 1885) notes that "even observers like the Dutchman
Cleynarts saw that, in spite of all its wealth and seeming prosperity, the
kingdom of Portugal was rotten at the core and could not last."
America has also served as a haven for the
Jews. The Jews in America today have risen to a greater position of power,
wealth, and influence than they have ever had in any other country. They
dominate the newspapers, book publishing, television and radio, movies,
universities - all of the educational media, as well as the commercial life of
the country.
The Jews have always proselytized for
racial integration - in Portugal, America, or in whatever country they have
been, for without such a climate of tolerance of alien races, they themselves,
would not be accepted. It has, therefore, been in the Jews' interest to
suppress evidence which would lead people to reject alien races.
History Rewritten
Our encyclopedias and history books have
been purged and rewritten. If you look up Portugal in the 1970 edition of the
Encyclopedia Britannica, you will not find anything about the role of the
Negroes and Jews in the history of Portugal, or anything about the decline and
fall of Portugal.
The Jews are briefly mentioned among others
who "exerted various influences over the territory which in the 13th
century acquired the frontiers of modern Portugal." There is no
elaboration of what this influence was.
The Negroes have been eliminated entirely.
They are not listed with the other ethnic groups in the ancestry of the
Portuguese people. In the entire 15-page article, there is no clue that Negroes
were ever present in Portugal or that they had any role or influence in
Portuguese history.
The 1970 edition of the Encyclopedia
Americana also makes no mention of the presence of Negroes in Portugal.
In all these sources you find
"facts," i.e., names and dates, but with no meaning and no indication
of what actually happened or why. However, if you can manage to find some older
sources, you can learn a great deal about the history of Portugal.
The article on Portugal in the 1911 edition
of the Encyclopedia Britannica contains more real information than you can get
in reading a hundred history books of more recent vintage. From our modern
point of view, this article would probably be called "racist," but
the point is that the presence and activities of the Negroes and Jews are
recorded. The information is there, and you can draw your own conclusions. The
article is actually pro-Jewish. There is also a scholarly analysis of the
factors in the decline and fall of Portugal, with the author tending to blame
the Inquisition, the Jesuits, and anti-Semitism.
However, neither his
conclusions nor his bias prevents him from including factors or information
which might lead the reader to a different conclusion.
Our modern scholars and authorities
eliminate information which might lead the reader to the "wrong"
conclusion.
Suppressing the Evidence
The 1964 edition of the Encyclopedia
Britannica still briefly lists the Negroes and Jews, along with others, as
Portuguese racial elements, but with no details or elaborations. By 1966, the
Negroes have vanished completely.
Now, what has happened between 1911 and
1966 that makes us purge and rewrite history in such a way? Have we decided
that race no longer is, or ever was, a factor in history? This cannot be, since
"Black Studies" are flourishing at our universities. Historians are
supposedly trying hard to discover all they can about the role of the Negroes
in history.
In a trial, a lawyer tries to suppress
evidence that would be damaging to his client. He tries to prevent this
evidence from reaching the jury. Our modern historians and scholars are trying
to suppress evidence. The Negro is their client. We are the jury - and we must
not reach the "wrong" verdict.
This, of course, reveals what the liberal
establishment really thinks of Negroes - that they are inferior and must be
protected. The evidence must be suppressed. The New York Times, et al., is a
lawyer, well paid, who knows his client "did it," but tried to get
him off.
Liberals in the United States often became
very self-righteous and superior when the former Soviet Union purged and
rewrote its encyclopedias, eliminating from its history current undesirables
and making them "unpersons." We ridicule their lack of objectivity
and irrational scholarship.
But we do exactly the same thing when we
rewrite history of Portugal and make "unpersons" of the Negroes (and
Jews). In terms of rewriting and deliberately falsifying history, we are much
closer to Orwell's 1984 than the Soviet Union ever was. Big Brother protects us
from dangerous knowledge.
Quo Vadis, Aryan Man
There is a great need for the American
people to know what happened in Portugal in the 16th century, for we are
repeating their experience. We are in the same predicament, at the same
juncture, at the same crossroads in history. There is an amazing similarity
between our situation today and Portugal's in the 1500's. Shall we take the
same road?
Travelers from other European countries
were amazed to see so many Negroes in 16th-century Lisbon, as are travelers
today in Washington, D.C. Our own capital is a large percentage Black, and, as
was the case in Lisbon, the Negroes do all the manual labor and service jobs.
The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica comments, "While the country was being
drained of its best citizens, hordes of slaves were imported to fill the
vacancies, especially into the southern provinces. Manual labor was thus
discredited; the peasants sold their farms and emigrated or flocked to the
towns; and small holdings were merged into vast estates."
Manual labor has been
"discredited" for many White people these days, and Negroes fill
these jobs. We are "too good" for it.
Americans Alienated
The American people are also leaving the
land and flocking to the cities or metropolitan areas, and our small farms have
been replaced by huge, mechanized farms.
If we had any colonies, many American men
would gladly emigrate to them. Many are leaving anyway for Canada, Australia,
and Europe. Those who remain feel rootless and displaced - from their jobs, their
country, and even their families. It is difficult to feel any sense of
belonging to what America has become today.
Stout Hearts - and Pure Blood
In analyzing the catastrophe which befell
Portugal, the historian H. Morse Stephens (in his book, Portugal, written in
1891) concludes:
"they [the Portuguese] were to produce
great captains and writers, and were able to become the wealthiest nation in
Europe. But that same sixteenth century was to see the Portuguese power sink,
and the independence, won by Alfonso Henriques and maintained by John the
Great, vanish away; it was to see Portugal, which had been one of the greatest
nations of its time, decline in fame, and become a mere province of Spain. Hand
in hand with increased wealth came corruption and depopulation, and within a
single century after the epoch-making voyage of Vasco da Gama, the Portuguese
people, tamed by the Inquisition, were to show no sign of their former
hardihood. This is the lesson that the story of Portugal in the sixteenth century
teaches, that the greatness of a nation depends not upon its wealth and
commercial prosperity, but upon the thews and sinews and the stout hearts of
its people."
This is rather old-fashioned language, but
what Stephens is saying is that, by the end of the 16th century, the quality of
the people was lacking. Other European nations suffered military defeat, but
continued to grow and develop. Portugal stopped dead in its tracks. It had
nothing to build on. Portugal can now only look nostalgically to the past. We
Americans must use this information as insight into our future. It is too late
to save the White Aryan people of Portugal, but we must save ourselves.